UK Government gets another smack from EU over Phorm

The Register reports today (UK gets final warning over Phorm trials) that the UK Government has moved closer to Infringement proceedings over the Phorm phiasco.

The UK government today came a step closer to international embarrassment over its failure to act against BT and Phorm for their secret trials of mass internet snooping technology.

The European Commission said it had moved to the second stage of infringement proceedings after the trials, revealed by The Register, exposed failings in the UK's implementation of privacy laws.

Apparently UK laws aren't tough enough to comply with EU directives on privacy.  In particular, it seems that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) allows snoopes to assume consent has been given merely by having "reasonable grounds for believing consent has been given".  Which is quite astonishing.

HMG is also admonished for not having an independent authority to look into and investigate complaints of unauthorised interception of communications.  Furthermore the EU directive makes no distinction over whether the interception was intentional - RIPA only concerns such intentional interception.

On the one hand the whole furore has bounced Phorm out of the UK market, and from what I've read over at nodpi.org its been wrong-footed in the various overseas markets it is now focussed on.  This together with its various ham-fisted attempts to smear its opposition has done Phorm no favours.

Now let's the HMG wriggle out of this one.  It is entirely in keeping with past form that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills chose to make no immediate comment.

 

Drupal vs Joomla! part 4: Still exploring Drupal

Some months ago, I wrote briefly on my early attempts at developing a website with Drupal. (see Drupal vs Joomla! part 1, part 2 and part 3)  I was pretty impressed by Drupal, but considered it had some odd omissions from the default installation.  In particular, the lack of a stock WSIWYG editor seemed pretty glaring, especially as installing an editor turned out to be so fiddly.

I've restarted the development of that website, and have concluded that:

  • my original comments, particularly regarding the editor are valid
  • that the Drupal themes (equivalent to Joomla! templates) are easy to apply, and even easier to tinker with
  • that my stock Drupal installation has no obvious way of scheduling the start and finish dates of publication of stories.  I found some instructions at the Drupal site, but this requires installation of additional modules (which may not be permitted by my institution).  This seems to be a significant omission, though perhaps that reflects my past experiences with Joomla!

Interestingly, I've now taken over administering a Drupal site on behalf of a professional society which means I really need to get to grips with Drupal!  I've been over at Amazon, and a book about Drupal is winging its way to me, despite the Postal Strike.  Maybe that'll be helpful! 

Cervelo P3 time trial frame

On Saturday, I made another sortie to the Local Bike Shop (LBS) to be bought a 50th birthday present, albeit somewhat early.  This took the form of a new time trial frame, and had been generously offered by Mrs Grumpy.  The trip to the bike shop was the third in a week or so during which I had been browsing the interweb and think about several different brands and models.

In the end, the decision was (apart from aesthetic grounds) made largely on whether the frame made use of standard components.  I decided against the Specialized Transition Module because of its oversize BB shell, which would mean I couldn't use any of my existing chainsets, and its slightly eccentric cable route to the rear brake caliper (I also didn't like the look when I saw it for real).  I went against the Argon 18 E114 because it had a rather odd system by which the handlebars attached to the steerer tube - this would have meant I couldn't use any of the existing handlebar/stem setups I have.  I looked at one or two other brands before plumping for a Cervelo.  But a P3 or a P4?  Both were reduced because the 2009 models were about to be replaced by 2010 models.

My final decision was for the P3, which is the cheaper of the two, on the grounds that, while I rather liked the hidden rear brake caliper of the P4, I wasn't sold on the  P4-specific bottle, which is designed to clip directly into the down tube of the frame.  The P3 just looked cool, is well known as a high quality TT frame, and appeared to use no non-standard components.  Mine looks like the image below, except it is labelled P3 instead of P3C, and the top end of the seat pin looks a little different.

Once I got the frame home, however, a question mark arose.  It hadn't been supplied with a steerer bung.  This is usually important for the function of the typical integrated headset, as the typical star-fangled nut damages carbon steerer tubes.  Anyway, I excitedly removed various parts from other bikes int he collection as I put that worry to the back of my mind.  On Sunday, I phoned the LBS to enquire if they had a steerer part as needed.  Fortunately, I mentioned that it was for a Cervelo P3 I'd bought there the day before - it turned out that the 3T carbon forks are fitted in a slightly different manner to all others I've fitted in the past.

Turns out that the 3T Funda forks have quite a thin-walled steerer tube - after cutting to length, one has to sand the inside of the steerer, then clean it with an alcohol wipe.  Then some supplied epoxy resin glue is mixed an smeared over an alloy tube that fits snugly into the the steerer tube.  The alloy tube has a built in star-fangled nut - it's then glued into place in the steerer tube and left to set for several hours before the fork can be mounted.

None of these parts or, indeed, instructions had been supplied with the frame, and We had to trail over to the LBS again for them.  With my heart in my mouth (noting the now-usual exhortations that if the job wasn't done correctly, I would risk accident, injury, or death), I cleanly cut the steerer, sanded it, cleaned it, and glued the tube inside.  The fork will be fitted later today (Monday) after it's had the best part of 24h to set.

No doubt it'll take a few evenings to transfer parts over to the new frame.  I can't wait to have a ride on the finished bike - the first competitive outing will probably be the New Year's Day '10'.  The frame is immaculately finished in an attractive paint job, and is damned light and at least looks aero.  I'm keen on the adjustability of rider position that is afforded by the seatpost which (in common with several framesets out there) allows the seat clamp to be positioned in either of two mounting slots.  This permits two effective seat angles to be selected.

More on the bike later as it's assembled!

Windows 7

I had thought of writing a pointless article about the launch of Windows 7 earlier this week, but really, I couldn't be bothered.  The big news in the OS world for me is next week's release of Ubuntu 9.10 'Karmic Koala'.  I've been running Karmic in alpha and then beta for some time now, very happily.  It's running on a 2.5 year old Vaio laptop that was never really capable of running the Vista Business that it came with, and very nice it is too (last week I booted into Vista last week for the first time since January 2008, but quickly decided I'd had enough of interminable spinny "wait...wait...wait" type cursors).

Despite my dislike for Microsoft's bullying business style, I kinda hope that the gargantuan misadventure that was Vista may be behind them.  Certainly there's quite a bit of enthusiasm for Windows 7 out there (and I don't just mean the breathless puffery at the likes of the BBC website), but quite a bit of it seems to be based on the observation that "it's not Vista".  Many commentators are saying however that for many a significant hardware upgrade is still going to be needed to get the max out of Windows 7.

I doubt I'll be bothering with Windows 7.  At my workplace we've remained with XP, and my PC there is underspecced for the XP-corollary of extensive virus checking that it seems to need.  In fact most of my day to day work as I hot-desk my way from office to office is done on my trusty Vaio.  Whether my workplace will upgrade to Windows 7 in the fullness of time, I don't know, but I'd expect that would be an expensive undertaking, with many thousands of workstations needing significant upgrade.  At home we have a mixed network of Ubuntu Linux and XP machines.

So I'll continue doing what I do with Ubuntu Gnu/Linux, I'm happy with an OS that's sufficiently transparent that I can be aware of what it's up to at any time, and that I can figure out a solution to any malfunctions.  The star in the crown of modern Linux distros is the easy access to an enormous array of software, and the ease of installation is light years beyond the hassles in my first foray into the world of Linux (with whatever version of Red Hat that was current in 1999).  There's too much that's good about FOSS software to return to the closed source of Microsoft et al.

Oh...I guess this was a pointless article about Windows 7...

Is Sidewiki evil? (Probably not, but it's annoying!)

Apparently the Google Toolbar has a new addition, Sidewiki. It's kind of passed me by, as I don't use the Google toolbar, but it's a bit misnamed.  It's not truly a wiki, but it does offer website visitors an opportunity to leave comments about a website or webpage. 

These comments are only visible to Sidewiki users (see picture).Sidewiki 

Unfortunately, the website owner may not only be unaware of comments attached to (and in many readers' minds therefore associated with) his/her website, but cannot control or moderate their content.

I've already added a Sidewiki blocker to Wonderful Life, and will shortly do the same to this website, and to the North Bucks Road Club, the Team Grumpy and the Northwood Wheelers websites. Of these sites, Flies&Bikes has never attracted many comments (so I presume not many Sidewiki comments), though Wonderful Life has been more active in that regard.