Google Buzz - WTF?

I have a Google Mail account, principally because it was the easiest way to set up an account with Google (for things like Google Maps APIs and a few webmaster tools).  I noticed a bit of a buzz on the interweb, but hadn't really looked into it (I normally use Evolution to access my gmail account via IMAP).

I was more than a little surprised to find that I'd been signed up for Buzz by default.  Fortunately I only had two contacts, because I rarely use gmail except as a mail drop for subscriptions, and I hadn't set up a public profile, so there was rather little impact.  I've now turned it off (via the little letters at the bottom of the gmail screen).  For others however, their contacts have been spread around as followers, and their mailboxes receive additional and frequently unwanted input.

 

The Register noted the swelling privacy objections (Google Buzz leaves privacy concerns ringing in ears):

And so it has come to pass - Mountain View’s sinister personal data grab has finally crept into the most sacred of all online communication tools. Gmail now has the ability to do social networking.

Google wants to out-Facebook Facebook, out-Twitter Twitter and out-Internet Explorer Internet Explorer and so and so and so, infinitum. But the ad broker’s relentless efforts to carpetbomb the entire interwebulator with its brand is becoming at best tiresome and at worst downright creepy.

The Register article is quite explicit about where the problems with Buzz lie - in the enforced Web 2.0 changes imposed on many people. A number of commentators have remarked on the privacy issues.  Molly Wood at CNET remarks (Google Buzz: Privacy nightmare):

I love the idea of neat new tech innovations that lead to streamlined communication, real-time updating, in-line video and photo posting, and supersimple friend and contact integration. I do not, however, like a product that bursts through my door like a tornado and opts me in to wanton in-box clutter and spam (or, more precisely, bacn) publicly reveals my personal contact list without asking me, threatens to broadcast my e-mail address anytime someone wants to @ me in a Buzz, and even appears to grab photos off my Android phone that I've never uploaded.

That, right there, is bad behavior, and given all the hue and cry about Facebook's inexorable attempts to expose everything about its users to the entire world, Google ought to know better.

A work colleague found pictures from his phone automatically uploaded to the web.  Another colleague (having thought they'd opted out by clicking an option to go straight to gmail rather than Buzz) emailed me to say:

I was automatically signed up to Google Buzz.  Tending towards paranoid myself, I had a quick look online (searching via Google of course) to see what the buzz is about Buzz.  It’s despicable that Google has signed up users without explaining explicitly what “it” is, or even confirming that they have done so.  I am incensed that, having clicked “Nah, take me to my inbox” they have assumed that means “I consent to this new service, about which I know nothing”.

It would appear that Google have been taking steps to ameliorate the effects of this potential privacy disaster, but not quickly or effectively enough.  Here's an example of what can happen (and reports of stalkers abound): F***you Google (there is strong language there, but entirely justified).

Here's my view. 

Email is email.  People sign up for an email service to send emails with a degree of privacy about the content and recipients, and they generally have a mixture of professional and personal contacts.  Often they wish contacts not to know about each other, for a variety of reasons.  An email account is different from a social activity like Twitter or Facebook or Posterous, and any major functional change such as Buzz ought at the very least be opt-in rather than opt-out.

Many educational outfits are using Google Apps to provide cloud software and email - apparently these users will have Buzz rolled out in the next couple of months.  I posted a negative comment to add to the gushing impatient ones at this official Google blog article (Google Buzz coming soon for businesses and schools),but as yet the moderators hadn't passed it. Ho hum.

xkcd - Batman and the randomised acne trial

The xkcd web comic has been particularly good lately (a standout was the Mars rover comic), but I found the quirkiness of this one just tickled my funny bone:

xkcd acne cream

BT and the heavy hand of censorship

British Telecom's customer help forums appear to have moved from beta to a final version.  During the great Phorm Phiasco, when BT were planning to use the vile Phorm DPI system to illegally pry into their customers' internet usage, there was great censorship in the beta forums (BT Total Censorship).  I bailed out when I got my final warning from the mods for using the word "it" - to refer to matters that were forbidden, in this case Phorm/Webwise.  All very amusing.  So how do the new forums shape up?  Not well.

We have threads being locked, and repressive conditions.  The whole edifice seems to be a kind of BT newthink where dissent is curtailed, and where moderators' responses differ as a discussion proceeds.  It's notable from the conditions, which explicitly state (and these are drawn from a banning email sent to one of the nodpi.org forum members who had posted there):

[..] Terms of Use, section 6.3 (g) which states: You must not upload, post, or otherwise transmit any content (including but not limited to text, links, communications, software, images, sounds, data, or other information) that includes any of the following inappropriate content: (g) Repetitive or continuous complaints about BT policy including allegations of abuse of privacy, use of third party suppliers or any other policy for any purpose. If you contravene these terms, this will be grounds for your access to the community to be suspended or revoked.

Ho hum business as usual, I think.  There's been a very interesting thread on new firmware that according to the OP allows BT access to the HomeHub, and is actually quite insecure.  Now, I'm not technically experienced enough to comment on the basis of the OP's complaint, but just read how the moderator's story changes as the thread proceeds, ending with an abrupt brush-off and locking the thread.

Finally, the BTCare home page has a twitter feed from @btcare.  A comparison of that twitter feed with the messages on btcare is very interesting.  Are they filtering out critical tweets?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Adventures in 7

Last week, I took delivery of the first new desktop PC I've bought in several years. One of the driving motivations was the form factor of the computer: I wanted a bigger screen than commonly available with a laptop, but also to keep the main box's footprint as small as possible. A decent keyboard & mouse also appreciated.  Just before Xmas, a flier from Dell plopped out of a magazine, and the Inspiron Zino caught my eye. This has a wireless keyboard and mouse, with a pretty small case. The monitor was extra. With Windows 7 upgraded from Home to Professional, the whole package was well under £500.

This is my first exposure to Windows 7 (other than looking at other peoples' laptops). I did have Vista on the Sony notebook that currently runs Ubuntu 9.10, but the notebook's specification was woefully underpowered for Vista, which made for a pretty vile experience. Plus 95% of my computer usage is with Linux these days (mostly Ubuntu). Windows was selected because the household uses both Windows and Linux.

Since receiving the PC, I've installed Ubuntu 9.10 on a partition, and have been setting up various bits of hardware and software (an on-going process). I think the comparison between the two systems is interesting from several perspectives.

For users moving from WinXP to Win7, I reckon there'll be a bit of a learning curve (there certainly has been for me). Everything's there, but arranged in slightly different ways. Icons are rather over-elaborate, making their function a little hard to discern at times. The start menu is vile (as it was in Vista), and makes it a bit of a pain to find programmes. It's possible this can be addressed in some setting tweak however (hints and tips most welcome via the commenting!). There's a nice Mac-style floating tool bar thing that's easily configurable to auto-hide off the edge of the screen. Not sure if that's a default feature of Win7 or if it's just themed by Dell.

The PC is blessed by an almost complete lack of crapware (Thank you Dell, thank you!). On the other hand, the default install doesn't really come with much in the way of serious software. There is a 60 day trial of Office 2007, and a default installation of Works. It came with McAfee antivirus/security software, which rather annoyingly set itself up without giving me the opportunity to say no - as my work network requires that we use Sophos, this was irritating. I set up VPN very easily. The PC sees the home network reasonably effectively, though I find the default layout of the Windows 7 file manager rather confused.
Overall, I find Windows 7 to be pretty good as far as it goes - rather a snappy boot time, but not much to do with it once it's booted. I downloaded GIMP. I downloaded Firefox 3.6 and a bunch of my favourite add-ons. The default browser with 7 is of course Internet Explorer, complete with a single search engine. Bing. With the IE shortcuts consigned to oblivion and replaced with the curly fox, I set about exploring. First up, to get the backup system working (this had been trivial with the Ubuntu partition). I had to identify and download a cygwin installation with rsync and ssh. After a few false starts, I got that done. I set up folders to share and got the rsnapshot.config syntax set up OK. Did a test run, no dice, appeared to be a firewall issue (confirmed by turning the firewall off for a brief period). No problemmo, just open a port. OK, how? I have to identify a programme, then point the firewall interface to the exe file to open a port (no indication what the port number is). Yep, works.

I installed iTunes (not my most favourite programme in the world, but I use it for the iPod Touch) - looks as though migrating my iTunes library may be a bit complex. Decide to postpone this. I go to install a driver for my printer (HP 2575). No joy, it's not listed. I wander off to the HP website, where a 378Mb download is available. Blimey! 378Mb! I decline. I notice an search for drivers option on the original Win 7 dialogue box. Click it. After a significant wait, lo and behold! a driver is available, which I download and install. I've no idea what it is, how big it is, or where it's from, but it can't be the monstrous HP file, since it sets itself up pretty quickly. And it works.

In contrast, the Ubuntu installation came with just about anything needed, with everything else (just about) available on demand via Synaptic. And it wasn't until jumping in and out of both OSs for a couple of evenings that I realised just what it was that I was finding difficult with Win7 (which to be honest, I don't actually dislike particularly).  This was a sense of constraint. I felt constrained by having only one desktop, by not really being able to change the desktop theme beyond basic colour and image options. Constrained by not knowing exactly what was in the various updates the system has been downloading. Constrained by software availability. And constrained by all the tweaks I'm able to implement on Linux but not on Win 7 (top must be a showdown between the guake terminal and being able to set double-clicking the window titlebar to roll up the window).

Postscript: Amid the myriad of small booklets that arrived in the box was a brief guide to the Ubuntu desktop! From the look of it, aimed at first time users of the Netbook version of Ubuntu...

Powered by ScribeFire.

Ghostery Firefox plugin sold

I picked the news that Better Advertising Acquires Ghostery via the No DPI forum.  Ghostery is a very popular plugin that identifies tracking scripts on webpages, and offers the option of blocking said scripts.   I'm not sure how significant this will prove to be, but I note from the Better Advertising web page that

We created Better Advertising because we knew there had to be a better way to conduct online behavioral advertising. Our goal is simple: provide solutions that help deliver the best ads and provide the best privacy, bringing transparency and trust to the online advertising ecosystem.

We do this by helping advertisers, advertising agencies, advertising networks, publishers, consumers, and industry associations to be accountable to each other and to make it clear, simple, and easy to understand how online behavioral advertising is occurring. We think improving the way data is collected, used and disclosed – and doing so in a transparent manner – will raise the quality of the entire online advertising industry. Most importantly, Better Advertising understands the importance of privacy to consumers.

Better Advertising’s technology helps online advertisers, agencies and networks continue to self-regulate. Working closely with our design partners, Better Advertising is at the vanguard of online advertising. The Better Advertising platform will enable advertisers to maximize their use of innovative digital strategies, including behavioral targeting, while meeting anticipated demand for enhanced transparency and consumer privacy.

I'm not sure that the acquisition of Ghostery by this lot is a good thing, and it's probably worth keeping an eye on the situation.  The NoDPI forum also points out a bug in the current Ghostery plugin which causes Firefox to take ages to close down.  This is something I've noticed lately, but not pinned down.


Powered by ScribeFire.