The latest release of Ubuntu linux (Ubuntu 9.04 - Jaunty Jackalope) was released a couple of days ago. In case you were wondering, this is a jackalope (by "Albrecht Durer" - published here on April 1st, 2008):

We had a splendid evening for this North Bucks RC club event, once again held up at the Astwood circuit - sunny, and with not much more than a breath of wind. This event was designated as a "Come and Try It" event, and riders were requested to be there by 6.30pm (also, starts were limited to 30 due to the failing light as this is still early season for an evening event). I had brought along a couple of guys along from work, but sadly we were thwarted. By the time we arrived, there appeared to be hundreds of riders milling around and all 30 slots had unfortunately been allocated. Fortunately, this didn't seem to disappoint my two new acquaintances, and Ian Stokes kindly suggested I ask someone of they'd be interested in riding a 2-up. At this point my beady eye cast around and spotted Lindz Barrall, with whom I had ridden a 2-up at Astwood earlier in the season.
Fortunately for me, Lindz was up for a two up, and set his Garmin for a 23:30 pace. Last time we had finished in 24:19, so that was quite a proposed improvement. But then again, this was a lovely evening... The only strategic discussion we had was to decide that this time I would lead off from the start. Once out on the road, we didn't exchange a single word - all chanegovers (bar one) were accomplished smoothly, and all in all we rode very well.
We were promised consultation on the Interception Modernisation Programme (IMP) by early in 2009, but as far as I can see this hasn't happened yet. Of course, in that time, we've seen considerable discussion of communication interception technologies (such as those devised and proposed by Phorm for commercial purposes) and the data retention directive emanating from the EC.
Now, The Register reports that developments in eavesdropping capacity are moving ahead (Spy chiefs size up net snoop gear):
After all the accusations of conflicts of interests (see for example 80/20 Thinking drops advisory work, after accusations of conflict of interest), Privacy International have apparently made a public statement concerning the implications of deep packet inspection on privacy. Oddly, you can read the statement at the nodpi website (Privacy International's Official Reponse on Deep Packet Inspection), but I can't see a mention yet at Privacy International's website. Perhaps the announcement at nodpi.org is connected with the announcement in the statement that the driving force behind nodpi, Alex Hanff, has joined the PI team on this matter:
To this end, we are pleased to announce a new addition to our team. Alexander Hanff, a social scientist and technologist who has led a long campaign against the use of Deep Packet Inspection for behavioural advertising models in the UK, will be taking the lead for Privacy International on these issues.
Wind: ENE 14mph; Hum: 48%
Another nice day forecast for this event, which I normally ride as part of a Team Grumpy 2-up entry. This year, I entered as a solo rider, but due to a misunderstanding with the organiser, ended up starting in the 2-up field. Team MK use a version of the Astwood circuit course that differs from that used by the North Bucks Road Club because the start/finish are located nearer Cranfield. The event once again used Cranfield University's new sports centre as its HQ, and Ian had managed once again to arrange pretty good weather: on the day, cool and cloudy condition changed to sunny, cool and surprisingly windy conditions which, while I had no trouble with the front trispoke, did make the going quite tough.
Wikimedia, who manage Wikipedia among other sites have announced via their blog that they have officially opted out of Phorm's deep packet inspection system. In their blog article, they indicate that one of their concerns is that by opting out, they might somehow legitimise Phorm's system. After due consideration, they decided the appropriate action would be to opt out of the system, and they show an extensive list of URLs that have been removed.
More good news on a week of exceptionally good news on the Phorm phront.
Chris Williams of The Register certainly has been working hard, and this in a week that's absolutely stuffed with stories relating to Phorm's violation of internet privacy! Today, he reports (Tory 'terror' affair shows danger of ubiquitous surveillance) on the circumstances surrounding the arrest a few months ago of Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green:
The "national security" justification offered by Jacqui Smith for the warrantless counter-terror police raid on a fellow member of Parliament's offices was trumped up by officials embarrassed by a series of leaks, we've now learned. The information about immigration failures fed to the Tories was politically damaging to the Labour government, but arguably in the public interest, and certainly no threat to national security.
The first evening event of the NBRC club time trial series! It was also the first event on the F5d/10 since the New Year's Day'10'.
Somewhat ominously, I woke to the sound of a 5am thunderstorm. Still, I reckoned, over 12 hours before the event, plenty of time for the weather to clear up (the BBC forecast was for sunshine)! Indeed, when I turned up to the club room at about 6.20, it was not only sunny, but very warm.
More good news on the Phorm phront. Alex Hanff over at nodpi.org reports that Amazon exclude all their domains from Phorm's WebWise. It has long seemed to me that it's the commercial angle that would sink Phorm's devious and parasitic plans. Hot on the heels of the news that LiveJournal have requested exclusion from the Phorm dpi system, comes the news that Amazon, possibly the biggest internet retailer is to do likewise.
This may the the beginning of an unstoppable momentum, and follows a lengthy (and it would seem effective) campaign led by the likes of Alex Hanff, who has worked tirelessly, with more energy than I have available to work towards the extinction of Phorm's dpi.
Richard Clayton has a nice, very clearly written article on what is wrong with Phorm, over at The Guardian (Whitehall's got Phorm). This should be required reading by news reporters who fail to grasp the real issue is the interception issue, and not the targeted adverts.
Meanwhile, Simon Davies of 80/20 Thinking and Privacy International, who has failed to make meaningful statements about Phorm (but who works as advisor to Phorm via 80/200, is quoted in an Independent report on the EC action (Internet privacy: Britain in the dock) as saying: