Icknield RC Charity '10' 12/9/10

This was, to all appearances, a glorious morning for a time trial - clear with light winds.  It was a little cold, but I guess that's just to be expected at this time of year.  I was a little apprehensive, as I hadn't been feeling particularly well the day before.  Over by the start line, I soon settled in, with a nice chat with the timekeeper and pusher-off.  Hovering just to the north of the start was a splendid sight - about 25 hot air balloons, resplendent in bright colours and at various altitudes.  Indeed, one of them seemed to be coming down just across the A1 from Tempsford.  Putting that distraction to the back of my mind, I rolled up to the start line just a few minuted before my start at 7.25am.For what was probably the first time in riding on the F1, I got briefly stalled at the Tempsford flyover roundabout, as a car got held behind someone warming up.  This wasn't too bad, as the road surface on the roundabout is still in a dreadful state due to last winter's extended cold snap, and I invariably have to pick my way carefully round the potholes.  Once out on the A1, I was quickly up to speed, but not a particularly brisk speed.  Never mind, I thought, it'll be easier on the return leg.  I found it difficult to push out much effort - whether this was due to being ill the day before, I wasn't sure.  Over the Sandy roundabout and on to the turn at Warden Lane.  Now, I thought, it must get a bit easier...except it didn't.However, I kept the effort going well enough to cross the line in 22:56.  Not my best time of the season (by a long chalk) but not out of the frame set by other riders.  Most of the riders I spoke to felt it was a heavy morning, and difficult to get the speed up.  So, not bad.This was my last domestic open time trial of 2010 (my only remaining event being next week's Duo Normand) - and I have to say that it's  bit of a relief to have a break from riding up and down this particular section of the A1.  This season I've ridden events at 10, 25, 50 and 100 miles on the F1 courses, all of which focus on the A1.  In particular, the current version of the F1/100 is on the A1 for the first 86 miles.  I think I've become rather jaded from seeing that particular section of tarmac.  On the other hand, it has been a good season with by times at 10, 25 and 50 miles being my best for around 5 or 6 years.

Tags:
  141 Hits

Catch 22 website situation

Grrr...Over the last couple of years, I've migrated two websites from their original hosting company to the same people who are my current ISP.  This was because of persistent "500 Internal Server Error" problems, always due to excessive load on the database servers.  These sites were flies&bikes and the North Bucks Road Club sites.  Since relocation, no problems whatsoever.Now, I find that the Team Grumpy site is effectively non-functional for the same reason, and advice from the hosting company is to make a copy of the database using phpMyAdmin, and use that to populate a new database on a different server.  That's a really easy thing to do...in principle, except that phpMyAdmin just times out, presumably due to the same server issues...leaving me in an annoying Catch 22 situation.

Posted via email from grumpybob's posterous

Tags:
  164 Hits

North Middx & Herts CA '50', F1/50

I woke quite early for this event, and happily was headache-free.  After a hasty trip over I signed on, grabbed my number, and rolled over to the start.  This event had a very small field - 17 riders - and it's to the credit of the organiser that he persisted with running the event.  Unfortunately I was off at#2, which meant I was likely to have a pretty lonely ride, with only one rider to catch.As it happened, that's exactly what happened.  The course runs south from Tempsford to turn at the Sandy roundabout, proceeds north across the Black Cat Roundabout to turn at the Buckden roundabout.  From there, we return to Sandy, then back to Buckden before finishing at the Girtford underpass just north of the Sandy roundabout.  As an aside, I might just observe that by this stage of the season, I'm getting heartily sick of riding up and down that stretch of the A1! The nadir being the '100' I rode a few weeks ago - the first 86 miles were on this stretch of the A1.Anyway, I caught #1 before the first turn (less than three miles, and from there on, I was riding on my own until #5 passed me just after the second turn at Buckden with about 12 miles to go.  One reason I dislike being so early in a field is that having a set of riders to catch (and indeed a set of riders who might catch me!) is that there's an element of having a target to chase, which usually adds a bit of performance enhancement.As usual, I found myself flagging a bit over the last five or six miles, so it was a bit of a relief to squeak a 1:57 - only just though, as my time was 1:57:58!Only one more ride on the A1 in 2010 - next week I've entered a '10' on the F1/10, which I think runs from Tempsford to the Biggleswade North roundabout and back.  Next week's weather looks a bit crap as far as Thursday, hopefully it'll brighten up for the weekend, as not only do I have a time trial, but it's the Woburn Oyster Festival!RESULTS

PosRiderClubTimeN1N2N3
1
Matt Molloy
Finsbury Park C.C.
01:50:52
V
27:11
2
Tom Boulton
Finsbury Park C.C.
01:52:34
S
n/a
3
Dave Kendall
Finsbury Park C.C.
01:53:24
S
n/a
4
David Vaughan
North Road C.C. (2nd Claim)
01:54:29
S
n/a
5
Tony May
North Road C.C.
01:56:45
V
34:13
6
Robert Saunders
North Bucks Road Club
01:57:58
V
29:40
7
Neil Allonby
Icknield R.C. Compomotive Wheels
01:59:07
V
17:54
8
Paul Bachini
Icknield R.C. Compomotive Wheels
02:02:38
S
n/a
9
Christopher Symonds
North Road C.C.
02:04:04
S
n/a
10
Peter Harridge
Icknield R.C. Compomotive Wheels
02:07:15
V
24:51
11
Dominic Whitehead
Herts Wheelers (2nd Claim)
02:13:13
V
16:38
12
John Pfeifer
Icknield R.C. Compomotive Wheels
02:17:48
V
33:28
1001
Richard Marriott
Verulam C.C.
V
DNF
1002
Jonathan Shubert
Verulam C.C.
S
DNF
1003
Ian Bibby
Finsbury Park C.C.
V
DNF Punc
1004
Samuel Skuce
Verulam C.C.
S
DNS
1005
Chris Smith
Whitewebbs C.C.
S
NSA

Tags:
  153 Hits

Astwood '10' 4/9/10 - lovely morning...but...

An early morning autumnal fog had just lifted to reveal a gorgeous time trialling morning - sunny and virtually still - as I rolled up the Astwood this morning for the 8th and final NBRC League event of 2010.  Unfortunately a week of insomnia and a 24 hour headache didn't really leave me feeling really up for the event.  In fact, had it not been for its league status, I might have given the event a miss (particularly as I was down to ride the North Midds and Herts CA '50' the following day).  Still, there I was, ready to give it  go.It had been a week or two since my last club time trial, and it was good to catch up with the guys again - some, like Geoff P. have been popping out some good times, while others seem to have hit the doldrums a bit (rather like I feel).  Anyway, being a late arrival I ended up as last man off at #10.  At the due moment off I went, and despite having to ease off for traffic joining the main roadgot off to a good start.  I rapidly found myself at >31mph.  "This won't last" I thought, and so it transpired.I really didn't feel able to give the event full whack, and indeed for the first half barely got my heart rate into level 3.  Things changed a bit further on, though not enough to rescue my ride - I ended up with 24:13, I think (results to follow).  Fastest on the day was Geoff Perry (TeamMK), with James Fox (Luton CC) close behind - a really good ride given James was on a road bike with no tri-bars.I still felt rubbish at the finish, and headed off home to go supermarket shopping.  In the parlance common in my previous club, I went like a bag of spanners.  Let's hope it goes better at tomorrow's '50'...

Pos. on
PosNoNameClubTimeCatVets Std.+ / -Vets Std
17Geoff PerryTeamMK23.34V5027.33.+ 3.592
28James FoxCC Luton23.48S
35Lindz Barrali-Team CC23.54S
49Richard WoodTeamMK24.01S
510Rob SaundersNBRC24.13V5027.33.+ 3.205
62Adrian CoxTeamMK24.24V4927.20.+ 2.566
74Rob ChaundyTeamMK25.44V5829.20.+ 3.364
83Clive FaineTeamMK27.04V6430.45.+ 3.413
91Karl Reed-SimpsonPrivate27.07V4426.18.- 0.497
106Gilbert WheelwrightNBRC27.29V6831.45.+ 4.161

Tags:
  142 Hits

It's not "magical", it's not "revolutionary" - but it's very nice (iPad that is)

Image via Wikipedia
Well, after several months eyeing up the range of iPads, during which time I thought long and hard about what I might actually use one of these things for, I finally took the plunge and bought one of these overgrown iPad Touches - in my case an iPad 64Gb with WiFi, but no 3G.I've always been a bit suspicious of the iPad platform and its tie-in to the closeted App store - so why the change of heart?  Well, I guess it's the realisation that a web-enabled media consumption device need not be thought of as a computer, and coupled with an upcoming trip to the USA for which the need for entertainment was key (particularly with the decent battery life the iPad reportedly has).On first sync, the iPad picked up a bunch of apps I had installed on my iPod, plus the music already on the iPod.  Some of the apps weren't really much use on the iPad, so away they went.  What apps have I installed?
  • Tweetdeck - doesn't seem to full-featured as the Air version on my Ubuntu laptop
  • Wordpress - an app from blogging to WP blogs
  • Stanza - nice, straightforward e-book reader
  • Mendeley - Research bibliography and networking
  • FeeddlerRSS - keeping tabs on my Google Reader account
  • Evernote - keeping tabs on the web
  • and a couple of games originally bought for my iPod
I've uploaded a few movies - one is a brief video of embryonic nuclear divisions going wrong in Drosophila (made by a graduate student), while the others are pure entertainment for the aforementioned transatlantic trip.  And now, some early observations, based on 48h ownership:
.
  1. The on-screen keyboard is surprisingly usable, except:
  2. Different apps and different tasks seem to call up slightly different versions of the keyboard, which I find a bit off-putting
  3. BBC TV watched through iPlayer on Safari works really well
  4. Videos work well
  5. As with the iPod, no manual supplied, you need to go online
  6. You can't charge from a PC USB port, which flummoxed me for a bit
  7. It synchronises very quickly
On the other hand, I really don't think it "magical" or "revolutionary" as much of the publicity blurb would have it - don't forget this is an overgrown iPod Touch!

Tags:
  144 Hits

Laurent Fignon RIP

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="181" caption="Laurent Fignon"][/caption]Cyclingnews.com reports (Former Tour de France winner loses fight against cancer) that Laurent Fignon, double Tour de France winner has died after suffering from cancer.  Sad news.

Tags:
  200 Hits

ScienceDirect -> SciVerse

Image via CrunchBase
I've been trying to overhaul my reprint collection* and bibliography, using the Mendeley Research Networks system.  Access to many journals comes via Elsevier's ScienceDirect, which has been down for most of yesterday "for scheduled maintenance".  At the moment it's throwing a "500 Server error".Anyway, a wee bit of internet searching reveals this is rather more than scheduled maintenance, and rather more of a major systems overhaul:
ScienceDirect, Scopus, Journals Consult and the Admin Tool will be unavailable due to scheduled maintenance for approximately 9 hours on Saturday, August 28, from 6:30am to 3:30pm Central Standard Time.  During this time, upgrades will be implemented to these systems as part of the launch of the new SciVerse platform. For more information about SciVerse, please visit www.acceleratescience.com.
I bet the ScienceDirect engineers had their hearts in their mouths at switchover time.  And I bet coffee consumption is hitting rather extreme levels...*Yes, the term "reprint" does reflect my age.  Actually I use pdfs.

  216 Hits

Should we eliminate mosquitoes? (Kill them. Kill them all?)

There's been some discussion in the columns of Nature recently concerning the possibility of eradication of mosquitoes. In an article entitled A World Without Mosquitoes, Janet Fang (1) presents a variety of opinions whether large-scale mosquito eradication is practical and if so whether such a course of action is desirable. In the latest issue of Nature, a collection of four letters revisit the controversy.So, there are two issues here: Can we?, and should we?[caption id="attachment_1044" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Anopheles gambiae feeding"][/caption]Some years ago, I had a brief foray in to the world of the Anopheles gambiae species complex, an experience which was quite novel for me as my experiences had been with a very different and more docile fly, Drosophila melanogaster.  And for several years I maintained a colony of A. gambiae in my laboratory, which while not in itself particularly difficult was certainly quite arduous and one strain required considerably more commitment and care than keeping several hundred Drosophila strains. At that time, there was quite a deal of excitement about the prospects of driving transgenes through wild populations, using as a model the spread of P-elements through wild populations of D. melanogaster during the 20th century.  There have always been concerns about the extent to which the entities known as 'species' really are homogeneous populations with consistent gene flow through them across their range: certainly within the A. gambiae species complex, there appear to be 'incipient species' which represent fairly hefty gene flow barriers within the individual sibling species of the complex.One caveat would be that even if one could eliminate an entire species, or a species complex, what would fill the vacant niche?  A. gambiae may be the most significant malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa, but there are others, that I guess could move in an colonise a vacant niche.  An argument for species control by transgenic means might be for eliminating a species that's newly colonised areas in which they haven't formerly been present: a good case might be if A. gambiae were to be introduced into South America.  More subtle interventions might be to introduce transgenes that impact on malaria parasite propagation within the mosquito: the downside would probably be that given the huge scale of the parasite population out there, somewhere there is likely to be parasites that can evade the introduced transgene.Sterile male release can be effective in controlling insect pests, but is really most effective where the female generally mates only once.  Drawbacks can include fitness of the males, either from irradiation used to sterilise them or because the laboratory-bred strains are uncompetitive in the wild.  Sophisticated technologies exist by which terile males can be made, so this may not be so major a hurdle in the future.Other, more traditional, methods of insect control are really very blunt instruments such as insecticide usage.  Obvious drawbacks would be collateral damage to other insect species, with the potential for massive ecological damage.  There are also health implications.  In the past, mosquito control by application of DDT was quite effective in Sri Lanka, then Ceylon, until over-enthusiatic and inappropriate use of DDT caused the appearance of DDT-resistant mosquitoes.  In the intervening years, malaria incidence had dropped, with the consequence that the resurgence of the disease as mosquito populations recovered was particularly severe (2).  I would be surprised if global eradication by insecticide would ever be approved.  And I cannot see a means by which wholesale eradication of many different mosquito species could be undertaken.  Fang's article provides a concise overview of the eradication/control techniques that have been tried in the past, and some that may be options in the future.In the context of should we eradicate mosquitoes, I'm really less well informed about the ecological implications of such a course.  Much of the online discussion seems to revolve around the ecological consequences of eliminating all mosquitoes, across all ecosystems, even in sub-Arctic tundra regions.  It would not be surprising to me if the ecological effects would be severe, but it also occurs to me that those consequences might well be unrecoverable. At the end of the article, Fang concludes that in her penultimate paragraph that:

Given the huge humanitarian and economic consequences of mosquito-spread disease, few scientists would suggest that the costs of an increased human population would outweigh the benefits of a healthier one. And the ‘collateral damage’ felt elsewhere in ecosystems doesn’t buy much sympathy either. The romantic notion of every creature having a vital place in nature may not be enough to plead the mosquito’s case. It is the limitations of mosquito-killing methods, not the limitations of intent, that make a world without mosquitoes unlikely.
The conclusions seems to be that (a) we couldn't do it, but that (b) if we could, we should, and it wouldn't make much difference ecologically.  Well, actually, I'd rather not try the ecological experiment![caption id="attachment_1045" align="alignnone" width="500" caption="Sabethes sp. mosquito"][/caption][caption id="" align="alignleft" width="269" caption="Sabethes cyaneus"][/caption]And anyway, would the world really be better without the beauty pictured above, a species in the genus SabethesSabethes species are often regarded as the "butterflies" of the mosquito world, frequently bearing brightly coloured or iridescent paddles on their legs.Here's another image (left), this time of a couple of Sabethes cyaneus, from the BBC website (click on the image for the full-size version).Finally, I've scanned in a plate (below) from F. V. Theobald's Monograph of the Culicidae or Mosquitoes, published in 1901 by the British Musem (Natural History) - The Plates volume.  These are (from left to right) Megarhinus inornatus (male), M. inornatus (female), M. separatus and M. immisericors.[caption id="attachment_1048" align="alignnone" width="708" caption="Megarhinus species (click for full size image)"][/caption]1.  Janet Fang (2010) Ecology: A world without mosquitoes Nature 466; 432-434 . doi:10.1038/466432a2.  Gordon Harrison (1978)  Mosquitoes, Malaria and Man, Chapter 26 Pub John Murray (record at Amazon.com)via ScribeFire

  218 Hits

Preparation for the Duo Normand; Soundtrack of my training 24/8/10

I've blogged a preview of this year's Duo Normand two-up team time trial (2010 Duo Normand Preview) - and about a week or two ago, I began thinking about ramping up the training for the event.  I've been something of an afficionado of Pete Read's turbo training manual - The Annual Manual a.k.a. The Black Book. This presents a straightforward and progressive month by month training programme.  It's safe to say this was behind my time trialling successes of 2000-2003.  Since then, as I think I've written, my ability to stick to a programme of training has been compromised by the demands of the day job. Over the time I was following the programme, I found I was able to fine-tune and tweak the programme to suit my strengths and weaknesses.  this was made easier by the collection of turbo training sessions that Pete Read presented in The White Book. [Apologies for the lack of web links to Pete Read, but last time I looked, his web presence had vanished]So the programme I've adopted sees me fitting in some turbo sessions of short hard intervals around longer low intensity road rides and some time trials (I have a '50' on 5/9/10 and a '10' on 12/9/10, the two weekends before the Duo Normand itself.  This morning's session was a set of 10 x 1 minute intervals at slightly higher than race pace, with 1 minute recoveries.  Quite a difficult session, albeit quite brief.  This, coupled with another variant, are progressive as I approach the Duo: in one case by doing more intervals, in the other by extending from 1' to 2' to 3' (and so forth) intervals.  I think these, together with the remaining time trials in my season will be enough to peak for the Duo, ideally with a few days easy beforehand. This morning's music accompaniment was provided by Acid Mothers Temple and the Melting Paraiso UFO.  This unlikely sounding mob are a Japanese psychedelic inprovisational group, and the album in question was Absolutely Freak Out (Zap Your Mind!). Even more unlikely than its applicability to an interval session is its cover, pictured right (click to link to Amazon).  Still, it provided an amusing distraction as I pounded away in the garage at 6am this morning!  (The music, not the cover).  It's something of a celebration that the iPod is now behaving itself, and scrobbling to last.fm.

Posted via email from grumpybob's posterous

  210 Hits

2010 Duo Normand preview

Team Grumpy have been riding the Duo Normand since 2003, only missing one year since then. We've had quite good placings in that time, either in the Veteran or Corporate categories. We came second in the corporate category last year, but that doesn't quite indicate the magnitude of the whipping we got from the winners! The Duo Normand website has started listing riders registered to ride. At the moment there are only two teams in the Corporatif category, one being Team Grumpy. Plenty of time for more entries to flood in, though. So is there anything to be said in a preview for this event?Well, we're staying near Cerisy La Salle - in the same location as last year - though our travel plans will preclude any significant 2-up technique practice before the event. And Team Grumpy's 2-up outings this season have been less than stellar (the Port Talbot Wheelers 2-up ‘25′ and the Icknield 32k). I guess we're just hoping that we've done it so long that we'll just fall naturally back into the swing of things.As usual, we'll take the opportunity to do a little exploration of the Normandy countryside on our tandem, see for example 2008 and 2009, enjoying the local food and drink, particularly the moules et frites, a particular favourite of mine.  And of course, drinking freely of the Team Grumpy official energy drink.Finally, for those who've never ridden the Duo Normand and want to see what the course is like from the rider's perspective, can I recommend the world's most unlikely video, which we dubbed Silent Movie.  This was recorded on a small video camera mounted on Gerry's handlebars.Here are our previous performances:2009 - CorporatifsWe may have been second, but just look at that margin!  The BikeRadar team of Jones and Coomber came flying past us...and can be seen in the video of the event.1 COOMBER Robin - JONES Jeff 01:15:222 ORAM Gerard - SAUNDERS Robert 01:25:022008 - CorporatifsBy 2008, Gerry had persuaded me to switch to the Corporatifs category.  Not entirely sure why, but the effect is to ride at a better time of day than the Unlicenced and Veteran categories.  Also the Veterans category has no handicapping.  The guys who won rode a storming race, particularly since they didn't look much like time triallists and were riding road bikes with clip on extensions.

2651LENOIR Alexis - LEGRIX Benoit01:15:55
2632ORAM Gerard - SAUNDERS Robert01:22:28
2007 - no ride2006 - VeteranImproved to second place, will less then a minute between Team Grumpy and the winners!  As far as I recall, this was the only year so far (touch wood) that we've raced in inclement weather.  It was also a weekend break in Normandy rather than a holiday.
2171MAYMAN David - HARRIS Mike01:22:44
2192SAUNDERS Robert - ORAM Gerard01:23:11
2005 - VeteranUp to fourth place in 2005...
2041HARRIS Michael - MARK Wunsch01:20:37
2022LE MAITRE Graham - DOWN Patrick01:21:51
2223CHAPLIN Lee - GRIFFITHS David01:23:08
2104ORAM Gerard - SAUNDERS Robert01:23:15
2004 - VeteranOn this occasion, we crept up the ranking to 5th place, and the margins between the top five riders were rather respectable.
2601HARRIS Mike - GREIG Steve01:20:05
2462FOX Paul - JARDINE Stuart01:20:28
2593DODKINS Alan - ROBINSON Ray01:21:10
2664BIGREL Pierrick - LECHARPENTIER Gilbert01:21:40
2645SAUNDERS Robert - ORAM Gerard01:22:18
2003 -VeteranThis was the infamous year of the cramp, when Gerry cramped up mid-race.  We'd been doing pretty well till that point.  Nonetheless, our first outing at the Duo was excellent fun.
2381JONES MARK - GERAN STEVE01:18:55
2142FOX PAUL - JARDINE STEWART01:19:38
2133WOODBURN JOHN - IDDLES ROGER01:20:59
2054LECHARPENTIER GILBERT - BIGREL PIERRICK01:22:05
2315DICKASON PETER - COOPER RUSSELL01:22:28
2336GALLIENNE DAVID - GARNHAM MICHAEL01:22:29
2037GRACE STUART - DONKIN ALAN01:22:54
2248MCMILLAN JOHN - LOVATT SIDNEY01:23:15
2069SAUNDERS ROBERT - ORAM GERARD01:24:01

  193 Hits