Wikipedia has a pretty good synopsis of Phorm, its history and its system. (This is the page that Phorm itself tried to edit to paint them in a better light).
The BT support forum has a thread for BT/Webwise questions. There are never any answers, but it's worth looking at.
So Frank Schleck transfers 7000 euros to Dr Eufemiano Fuentes, who he claims never to have met, has never sought to make use of a prohibited substance or method. Should I send him my bank details so he can send me 7000 euros? (Report at cyclingnews.com)
Seriously, how stupid does he think we are? What was the payment for, then? He goes on to offer a DNA test to match the blood bags retrieved during the investigation. Whats that? The blood's not available for testing? That's OK then.
I got my MAC, now to switch to a new ISP, an ISP that respects users' privacy, and which won't deal with Phorm.
I also finally got a response to my email requesting my web pages not be scanned by Phorm, a request that was NOT sent to an obviously Phome address, but which was read by at least 12 Phorm employees.
I have to confess to being something of a novice with mobile comms. I have steadfastly refused to have a mobile phone on the grounds that I don't want people phoning me up! The various acronyms associated with mobile comms still confuse me a bit, and I have never sent a text message! However, I find myself travelling quite a bit, and within the UK, it seems to me that in British hotels internet access is often just another way to extract cash from the guests. (This is is contrast to my experiences in the USA and Japan). One criterion I had for selecting a system was that some support for Linux should be available. Browsing various fora, I decided to have a go with the Vodafone system.
Vodafone have a quite a large website covering development of drivers etc for their mobile devices including the USB modems. The associated Betavone Forge site has a forum which was very helpful in getting the system working on Linux (Ubuntu 8.04).
Ofcom have published a consultation document entitled "Delivering super-fast broadband in the UK": this is an interactive affair, and I notice that the comments on one particular paragraph exceed the others. Guess what that's about?
1.38 The introduction of new business models can be controversial, but may be very important in the delivery of new access networks. Regulation can have a role, for example in helping to increase consumer confidence in new services. One example is improving consumers' perception of behavioural advertising. We are interested in views on where else Ofcom can assist in new commercial developments.
The information at the BT Webwise page seems to me to avoid discussing BT's real motives in proposing to employ this system. The quoted blocks below come from BT's Webwise page.
BT Webwise increases your protection against online fraud and makes ads that appear on participating websites more relevant to your interests. It's completely free for BT Total Broadband customers and you don't have to download or install any software for it to work.
This is rather disingenuous. Most modern browsers offer protection against phishing sites. I strongly suspect that most broadband users would prefer to minimise all advertising: certainly this is one reason I use Firefox with its adblock add-on. Of course it's free, BT will be selling our browsing history
Lest readers feel I (and others) overstate the dangers of the deep packet inspection that is about to be perpetrated on BT Internet customers, here is a quote from Kent Ertegrul, CEO of Phorm, Inc.:
I just received the Glasvegas album (cover to left). I came across this (believe it or not) from listening to the BBC World Service very early one morning. I was taken by the strange Glaswegian wall of sound. To be honest they do remind me at times of Win, particularly in the vocals, but that's no bad thing, particularly combined with an appealing sort of indie version of a wall of sound!
Cyclingnews.com reports that Floyd Landis, who tested positive for testosterone and was stripped of the 2006 Tour de France title only days after finishing in Paris, has launched an appeal against the final CAS decision to uphold their verdict of his guilt. Oh, and the $100k bill he got stuck with. The bases for this action are two-fold - firstly that the three arbitrators on the panel (including the one chosen by Landis and his team) had conflicts of interest, and that the decision on dumping the costs on Landis was made in a way that prevented any right for his team to respond.
What's less certain is whether the appeal can actually go anywhere - it is an appeal to a US Federal court, while the CAS arbitration was decided at their HQ in Switzerland. Landis is due to return to racing in 2009, having served his ban. There seems to be a curious pattern with high profile sports doping cases involving American athletes, with defence often hinging on perceived (and often minor) procedural defects. Rarely are the athletes really able to challenge the laboratory tests themselves. I recently wrote about an opinion piece in the journal Nature, which seemed to me to be rather cautious on the statistics of positive dope tests, particularly during lengthy sports events such as the Grand Tours.
I just read on The Register that British Telecom will begin their third trial of the despicable Phorm data pimping service. For reasons why this is so appalling, visit the nodpi and badphorm websites.
Alex Hanff over at nodpi reckons that the opt in/out system it seems that the BT data pimps will use still falls foul of legal requirements. For my part, I believe that the whole system is vile, immoral and underhand. There are a variety of aspects to the antics that the BT Data Pimps have conducted over the last few year that leave a particularly sour taste.
A still, clear, and quite chilly morning, with a few wisps of mist greeted the riders who turned out for the North Bucks Hill Climb Championship for 2008. As usual, held on F5z/H (for the uninitiated, the climb from Bow Brickhill to the golf course on top of the hill). There were loads of mountain bikers hanging around and starting their ride in the woods, but none could be persuaded to take part.
I have to say at this point that I hate hill climbs. I like cycling up big long hills, but sprinting up short steep hills seems foolhardy to day the least. Anyway, my effort in the 2008 championship came to a quick end, as I got stopped on the steepest part of the climb by some twerp in a 4X4 who decided to stop to hold a conversation with someone. That kind of buggered up my ride, and I lost enthusiasm after that. Oh well.
I came across a link to Excrementum Can. (canine faeces) in a comment left at the excellent quackometer site. Helios Homeopathy do indeed sell Excrementum Can. at a variety of extreme dilutions (can't be much fun doing those preparations, at least for the early dilutions). Dilutions offered are 6C - 10M, but while I know that 6C is six 100 fold dilutions, what's 10M? Is that ten 1000 fold dilutions? [Edit: at this site, it is revealed that 1M = 1000C. This reaches the heights of absurdity. 10M must therefore be 10000C, or 10000 successive 100-fold dilutions! I am losing track of this level of dilution - perhaps someone less mathmatically challenged that I am first thing in the morning can calculate this...do they really mean 10-20000?]
More about this quack stuff at provings.info, but it's not terribly obvious what it's supposed to do. The onward link is in German, with registration required, so I didn't go there.
Cyclingnews.com reports that there is evidence that Frank Schleck was a client of Dr Eufemiano Fuentes, the notorious Spanish sports doctor that offered blood doping services to a seemingly large swathe of the pro peleton (and a bunch of other sports - but that seems to have been swept neatly under the carpet). Frank Schleck is implicated as "Amigo di Birillo", Birillo being the code name for Ivan Basso. Basso of course denied involvement until sufficient evidence piled up, then accepted a ban.
The Fuentes case seems to have gone a bit cold, but the bags of blood - each labeled with a puerile codename - are still being held. It's about time these cheats got identified for once and all by DNA testing.
This year, Team Grumpy made a fifth visit to the Duo Normand time trial, and of course Carol and I were keen to make a holiday of it. We stayed in a house south of St Lo. We took our trusty Dawes tandem to explore the surrounding countryside. In the descriptions below, each day has it's own photo gallery: click on the thumbnail to see the full image; click on the large image to advance to the next in the series.
The report on the Duo Normand itself is in a separate blog entry.
The Duo Normand two-up team time trial is held annually in September on a 54.3km circuit based in the Normandy town of Marigny. from a British time triallist's point of view, it's a spectacular event - not only because of the numbers of spectators, but because of the large numbers of competitors (in many categories from unlicenced to professional) and the virtually closed roads. All the teams can have a following car in case of mechanical problems, though Team Grumpy have never availed themselves of this in the 5 occasions we've ridden it.
Over at the Quackometer blog, a report that a quack's legal action against the Guardian over an article by Ben Goldacre has failed. Goldacre himself writes about it in the Bad Science blog (and presumably in today's Guardian).
This libel action has cost the quack, Matthias Rath, £500k for the Guardian's legal bills, and probably the same again for his own costs. Whether it will silence him and his business, I don't know.
Here's a smashing paper - a deeply detailed analysis of the Drosophila escape response. What's more, it's hard to see the usual justifications we need to use in grant applications. And a paper about "looming threats...
Ben Goldacre will be familiar to Guardian readers and those (like me) who regularly check up his Bad Science blog. This book shares much of the subject matter Goldacre covers in his blog: bad science journalism, dodgy medical research, quack medicine and the like. Goldacre really considers bad science as it applies to medicine and medical research.
Since I've not finished this book yet, this is not so much a review as a heads-up that it's out, available from Amazon (click the image), and that from the chapters I've read, it's a very readable counterblast to dodgy science. Chapters cover topics such as dodgy health "experts" such as Gillian McKeith and Patrick Holford; media and MMR (and other health scares); CAM "treatments", and much more.
